A concise trade compliance briefing on Modern Slavery Act reporting in the UK and Australia, covering current enforcement status, penalties, and core compliance obligations for in-scope companies.
Modern Slavery Act Compliance (UK/AU)
The UK and Australia both require in-scope businesses to publish annual modern slavery statements, but neither regime currently imposes the same level of direct reporting penalties. In the UK, the reporting duty under section 54 is enforced through civil injunctions, with contempt of court exposing a non-compliant company to an unlimited fine.[1][8] In Australia, the federal Modern Slavery Act is built around transparency and voluntary compliance; it does not currently create criminal, civil, or administrative penalties for reporting failures, although the government can seek explanations or remedial action from entities that do not submit a statement.[9]
In the UK, a commercial organisation is in scope if it supplies goods or services, carries on business in the UK, and has total turnover of at least £36 million, including group turnover where relevant.[1][6][8] The statement must be approved by the board, signed by a director, published prominently on the company website, and updated annually, usually within six months of the financial year end.[1][6] The statement should describe the organisation’s structure, policies, due diligence, risk areas, effectiveness measures, training, and the steps taken during the year to prevent slavery and human trafficking in operations and supply chains.[1][6][8]
Australia’s federal regime applies to reporting entities that meet the relevant threshold and requires an annual Modern Slavery Statement covering modern slavery risks in domestic and global operations and supply chains.[3][9] The framework mirrors the UK’s transparency model and focuses on disclosure rather than mandatory prevention systems backed by penalties.[3][9] Current Australian guidance indicates that failure to comply does not trigger direct sanctions, but non-reporting can still create regulatory scrutiny and reputational exposure.[9]
For trade compliance teams, the practical risk is not only legal but also commercial: non-compliance can affect tender eligibility, counterparties’ due diligence, lender assessments, and public reputation. In the UK, the enforcement environment is still relatively light in practice, but the legal mechanism exists and courts can compel compliance.[1][8] In Australia, the absence of direct penalties does not reduce board-level exposure, because investors, customers, and regulators increasingly treat modern slavery reporting as a governance and supply-chain integrity issue.[3][9]
Key compliance priorities are to verify scope, map supply chains, document due diligence, track remediation, obtain formal board approval, and publish statements on time. Companies should also align the statement with actual risk controls; generic or boilerplate disclosures create reputational and misstatement risk even where monetary penalties are limited.[1][6][8]
---
Create a Modern Slavery Act compliance record — Trade Compliance Records issues permanent SHA-256 cryptographic compliance rec...